In any competitive race, an opponent’s attack is inevitable. The standard playbook is to go on defense: issue a statement, correct the record, and hope to neutralize the damage. But the most sophisticated teams know that a well-handled attack isn’t just a threat to be neutralized; it’s an opportunity to be seized.
This is a story of how one campaign used a disciplined rapid response workflow to not only defeat a negative narrative but to turn it into one of their most successful fundraising moments.
The Situation: A Targeted Attack
The “Sarah Jenkins for City Council” campaign was a grassroots effort focused on smart, sustainable community development. Her opponent, funded by large real estate developers, saw an opening.
At 9:15 AM, a local news blog published an article titled, “Easton Slams Jenkins’ ‘Anti-Business’ Vote on Downtown Project.” The story framed Sarah’s pivotal vote against a controversial luxury condo development as proof that she was hostile to economic growth. The attack was designed to peel away moderate, pro-business voters.
The Challenge: Speed and Strategy
The campaign manager knew they had a small window to act before the “anti-business” narrative took hold. Their goal was twofold:
- Neutralize the Attack: Quickly reframe the vote not as anti-business, but as pro-community.
- Activate Their Base: Use the attack to energize their own supporters who had championed Sarah’s stance against the oversized development.
The challenge was doing both, fast, with a small team.
The Workflow: From Intelligence to Action with Aedric
Instead of a chaotic flurry of emails, the campaign manager turned to their Aedric dashboard.
- 9:16 AM: The attack article appears in their Local Feed. The manager immediately “Collects” it, saving it to their intelligence hub and categorizing it under their existing issue, “Sustainable Development.”
- 9:17 AM: They click on the saved article and select the option to create a “Fundraising Email Draft.”
- 9:18 AM: Aedric analyzes the article’s context and presents three potential content angles for the email:
- An angle focusing on the economic details of the vote.
- An angle highlighting the negative environmental impact of the proposed project.
- An angle framing the opponent’s attack as proof that he sides with powerful developers over local residents.
- 9:19 AM: The manager selects Angle 3. It’s the most powerful narrative, turning the opponent’s attack into a clear story of “us vs. them.”
- 9:20 AM: Aedric generates a high-quality email draft. It incorporates the campaign’s pre-set “Community Advocate” voice, reframes the vote as a courageous stand for the neighborhood, and seamlessly pivots to a powerful call to action.The draft included a key paragraph: “This attack isn’t a surprise. It’s what happens when you stand up to powerful special interests. Our opponent is funded by the very developers who wanted to change the face of our community. They’re attacking us because they know Sarah can’t be bought.”
- 9:25 AM: After a quick polish and adding a donation link, the email is sent to their entire supporter list.
The Result: A Record-Breaking Hour
The response was immediate and overwhelming.
The email not only armed their supporters with the right talking points to counter the attack online, but it also tapped into their passion. By framing the attack as a battle against powerful outside interests, the campaign gave their base a clear reason to fight back.
In the first hour after the email was sent, the campaign had its single most successful hour of online fundraising to date. They had not only neutralized the attack but had capitalized on the energy it created, turning a potential crisis into a tangible strategic and financial victory. It was a masterclass in turning defense into offense.