The arrival of powerful generative AI has presented advocacy organizations with an incredible opportunity. The ability to draft communications, analyze information, and scale messaging at unprecedented speed promises to level the playing field, allowing even small teams to make a major impact.
But with this great power comes a profound responsibility.
In the world of advocacy, our currency is trust. We ask the public, policymakers, and donors to believe in our cause, our data, and our mission. The moment that trust is compromised, our influence evaporates. As we integrate AI into our work, we must do so not with blind enthusiasm, but with a clear and disciplined ethical framework.
This isn’t about limiting what AI can do for us; it’s about ensuring that how we use it strengthens, rather than erodes, the foundation of trust upon which all successful advocacy is built.
Here is a simple framework with four core principles for the responsible use of AI in your organization.
1. The Principle of Human Accountability
AI should always be a co-pilot, never the autopilot. The final strategic judgment, the final edit, and the ultimate responsibility for every piece of communication must remain with a human professional.
- In Practice: Use AI to generate first drafts, brainstorm angles, or summarize complex information. But the crucial decision—which angle to take, what message to send, whether the content accurately reflects your organization’s position—is a human one. An effective AI workflow should have built-in moments for human strategic choice, ensuring the technology augments your team’s judgment, not replaces it.
2. The Principle of Grounded Accuracy
Generative AI models are not fact-checkers. They are powerful language predictors. To mitigate the risk of factual errors or “hallucinations,” every significant claim generated with the help of AI should be grounded in a specific, verifiable source document.
- In Practice: Instead of asking an AI a generic question, your workflow should start with a piece of vetted intelligence—a news article, a research report, a policy paper. The AI should be tasked with generating content based on that specific source. This simple step dramatically increases factual accuracy and turns the AI from a potential source of misinformation into a powerful tool for synthesis.
3. The Principle of Authentic Representation
The goal of using AI in communications is to scale your principal’s authentic voice, not to create a synthetic one. The public connects with the genuine passion and expertise of your leaders; a generic, robotic tone will break that connection instantly.
- In Practice: A responsible AI system should be built around a “Voice Profile” for your key spokespeople. This profile, containing their core message pillars, specific vocabulary, and examples of their writing style, acts as a set of strategic guardrails. It ensures the AI’s output consistently reflects the style, substance, and worldview of the person it represents, preserving the authenticity your audience expects.
4. The Principle of Intentional Transparency
The debate around AI disclosure is still evolving, but the core principle is timeless: don’t mislead your audience. While you may not need to add an “AI-generated” label to every social media post, you should have a clear internal policy and be prepared to be transparent about your use of these powerful tools.
- In Practice: Be honest with yourselves first. Are you using AI to help your experts communicate more effectively, or are you using it to create the illusion of expertise where none exists? The former is an ethical and powerful use case; the latter is a dangerous deception.
Embracing AI ethically is not a constraint; it’s a competitive advantage. The organizations that build sustainable, long-term influence will be those who prove to their audience that they can innovate with integrity.
Aedric's Blog 